Monday, September 28, 2009

Did the "Chicken and Egg Problem" just made way for the "Phone or Camera Puzzle" ?

More often than not, I have been in occasions when I wished I had my camera with me. Let's face it, not many people carry a camera in their pocket everywhere they go (even Point and Shoot). On the other hand, most people carry a camera phone in their pocket.

So far, camera phones have not been able to match even the most basic Point and Shoot (PnS) camera in terms of features as well as image quality. While some of the latest camera phones are equipped with 1/2.5", comparable to many PnS cameras, phones lose out when it comes to lenses. Many of the current phones are equipped with mere pinhole-camera like lenses instead of the extending lenses of many PnS.

Here comes the SCH-W880. Finally one company, Samsung, decides to put some full fledged PnS quality features in a 3G phone (or vice versa). While this is not new, Casio released a phone version of the Exilim camera earlier, the Samsung phone is a full fledged 3G phone with a heavy weight 12mpx camera sensor. The Exilim phone has very basic 2G phone functionality and a less impressive 5mpx camera.

Efforts for device convergence have definitely taken a quantum leap.

- Model No. M8920 or SCH-W880
- 3G (UMTS)
- Bluetooth
- 720p HD Video at 30fps
- 3x Optical Zoom (with extending lens), 35mm-105mm Full Frame Equivalent
- Flash LED light (AF Assist?)
- Xenon Flash
- 3.3" AMOLED Screen
- 12Mpx sensor (Same as Pixon 12, Size:1/2.3")
- P,M, Auto, SCN, HD Mode Dial
- Dedicated Shutter Button
- Zoom lever around shutter button
- 115.8 x 56.9 x 16.3 mm

Updated: From new information that the camera starts from 6.3mm - 18.9mm and that of Pixon12 to be 4.9mm (28mm equiv), I deduce that the sensor in this phone is 1/2.3". This is unusually larger than most other camera phones and larger than many PnS. Sensor Size : 6.16 x 4.62 mm Crop Factor: 5.62x F-Stop: f3.0-f5.6 ( little slow)

This definitely looks more than a camera with phone features rather than a phone with camera features. One gripe I have with regards to this phone is the size, which looks rather big for a camera phone. If you see it as a PnS camera with phone function however, it is as tiny as it gets :-)


7D Gets High....on ISO

For the past 2 years, Nikon has been leading Canon in the high ISO battle with their D300, D90, D5000 and D3000 dSLR, all using the same 12mpx sensor. All Canon managed was a weak 50D as a response. Canon's latest model (prior to the 7D announcement), the 500D, fared a little better but in most reviews, the D90/D5000 are still hailed as the kings of high ISO in the APS-C market. Will the 7D do any better?

As a start, with the release of 7D, Canon seems to have managed to match (or exceed) almost every single aspects of the D300/D300s least on paper.

However, experience told us that what's on paper does not always translate to better image quality. For example, the 50D's gapless-microlens technology was supposed to give better high ISO performance but never really delivered what was promised. Canon fans have been waiting anxiously to see what the image quality of the 7D will be like. Will it be another disappointment?

Will Canon be able to squeeze in 20% more pixel into the 7D, making it 18mpx while at the same time, improving the high ISO performance up to the point that it matches the D300s, Nikon's latest? Sounds impossible... doesn't it?

I thought so too. Then a discussion on dpreview sparked some hope...

I began to make own observation of the image samples from ISO 1600 - ISO 6400. Finally, I picked the set from ISO 3200. Why ISO 3200?

ISO 3200, in my opinion is the most crucial battle front for high ISO supremacy. Most of the current crop of APS-C dSLR show only minor differences at ISO 1600, while ISO 6400 is normally too noisy to make any conclusive observations.

I also chose images with NR-OFF. This is because I am more interested to compare the 'raw' sensor performance rather than NR strategies.

Here are the crops of the images I was looking at, from

(click image for full sized version)

Images at ISO 3200

Noise Reduction - OFF
credit: (please make donations to

My observations:

  • Noise - The D300s is significantly noisier than the 7D. The red cloth swatch is grainier on the D300s than on the 7D. Also, the gray area between the two bottles is grainier on the D300s. The 7D remains reasonably clean while blotches (caused by chroma noise) start to appear on the D300s output, especially on the gray area between the two bottles.
  • Details - When a camera produces clean images at high ISO, it does not necessarily mean that it has better ISO performance. It could be that by default, it applies a strong NR (yes, some cameras do that even when NR is OFF.... hellooo Sony). If that was true, then details would likely be smeared. However, this does not seem to be the case here. The details of the 7D is still notably better than the D300s. For instance, the 7D retains very good details on the red swatch. Veins on the red leaves are still visible and they are visibly better than those produced by the D300s. Moving down to the lower images, 7D retains the horizontal lines on the word 'Pure Brewed' almost perfectly while in the D300s output, the horizontal lines are already blurred. Similarly, the 7D kept visibly better details on the HELLAS bottle, the mesh pattern on the black background has been well retained. On the other hand, the D300s starts to smudge the label and yellowish patches begin to appear bellow the word 'HELLAS'.
  • Color - The other effect of high ISO is reduced color intensity and decreased Dynamic Range. Looking at the red swatch, the 7D still produced vibrant red color while the D300s starts to produce visibly duller color. However, the D300s still produces a more saturated yellow for the liquid in the bottle. Overall, the Canon retains much of the color at this ISO, edging out the Nikon.

  • The Canon image is definitely the cleaner of the two. Ofcrouse, there is a possibility that Canon apply some NR even though the NR is set to OFF. Whatever Canon is doing, for sure it is not at the expense of image details.
  • The details of the Canon image at ISO 3200 is simply stunning. In most key areas, the Canon is out resolving the 12mpx sensor. This is by no means an easy feat (Remember that the G10 lost out to the LX3 in terms of details at high ISO, despite having 40% more pixels.)
  • Unlikely as it seems, especially with the recent disappointment with the 50D, Canon has managed to do the impossible - adding 20% more pixels to a sensor while improving the high ISO performance to a level at which it not only beat its predecessor, it actually matches or possibly even beat Nikon's latest and greatest APS-C camera, the D300s.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

7D - So far

So far, several sites have posted previews, sample images and measured performance on the 7D. They all carry the disclaimer of a 'beta camera' and promises an even better performance when the final version is released.

Here are my thoughts so far:

1) High ISO Noise - As far as I am concerned, I only use up to ISO 1600. ISO 3200 is a nice to have but I will only use it in extreme emergency. From the sample images, ISO 1600 is definitely better than 50D. Some sites says it is about 1/2 a stop better than 50D and that it is now a draw with the D300. In my opinion, it is still a little behind the D90. However, taken into consideration the 50% can in pixel count over D90, I think the high ISO performance is simply stellar.

2) AF speed - The measured full AF speed by imaging-resource put it at almost double that of the Nikon D300. While pre-focused, manual focus and contrast detect focus speed is behind the D300, it does show Canon's new AF system hold tremendous potential

3) Resolution - From my visual observation, the 18mpx seems to have been given a slightly lighter low pass filter, giving it a good resolving power. I have yet to see a comprehensive MTF chart on this but with 50% more pixel, I doubt Nikon can pull any more tricks to match the resolution of the sensor. (Nikon managed to somehow match resolution of the Canon 15mpx 500D with the 12mpx Nikon D5000 when ACR is used to convert the raw files.)

Other unmeasured aspects include:

1) Dynamic Range - This should be interesting to see.
2) True MTF Resolution
3) AF Tracking accuracy and speed

Other aspects of the camera which cannot be truly appreciated by just reading include:

1) Viewfinder
2) LCD screen
3) Feel of the grip
4) Overall responsiveness